Graft vs Cursor
Both Graft and Cursor are AI-native code editors built from the ground up for AI-assisted development. While Cursor is a fork of VS Code with inline AI features, Graft is a standalone editor designed around autonomous agents that work in parallel across your codebase.
Why developers choose Graft
- Run multiple agents simultaneously, each in their own git worktree, so changes never conflict
- Full codebase awareness with git history. Agents read every file and understand your project's evolution
- Bring your own API keys on all plans, including Free. Use any AI provider without paying for a subscription
- A real editor with syntax highlighting, file tree, tabs, and breadcrumbs, not a chat window with code blocks
Frequently asked questions
Is Graft a fork of VS Code like Cursor?
No. Graft is a standalone code editor built from the ground up for AI-native development. While Cursor extends VS Code's architecture, Graft was designed around parallel agent execution and git worktree isolation from day one.
Can I use the same AI models in Graft as in Cursor?
Yes. Graft supports Claude, Codex, Gemini, and dozens of other models. You can bring your own API keys on all plans, including the Free tier, giving you full control over which models you use.
How does Graft's parallel agent execution differ from Cursor's background agents?
Graft runs multiple agents simultaneously, each in their own isolated git worktree. This means one agent can write tests while another implements a feature, and changes merge cleanly because they operate in separate working directories. This is architecturally different from running tasks sequentially or in the cloud.
Which editor should I choose if I rely on VS Code extensions?
If you depend heavily on specific VS Code extensions, Cursor may be a better fit since it's built on VS Code. Graft is a standalone editor optimized for AI-first workflows with parallel agents and full codebase context.
Free to start. No credit card required.